A a snelling radioactive dating in conflict dual attraction dating site
At this decay rate, hardly any carbon-14 atoms will remain after only 57,300 years (or ten half-lives).So if fossils are really millions of years old, as evolutionary scientists claim, no carbon-14 atoms would be left in them.So rock samples that should read zero are occasionally placed into the instruments to test their accuracy.What better samples to use than fossils, coals, and limestones, which are supposed to be millions of years old and should have no radiocarbon?Many people think that scientists use radiocarbon to date fossils.
But samples of organic materials taken from every rock layer, such as fossils, coal, limestone, natural gas, and graphite, all have measurable radiocarbon.
(This percentage, technically known as percent modern carbon [p MC], shows the ratio of radiocarbon in the rocks and fossils compared to the amount we find in living things).
This finding is consistent with the belief that rocks are only thousands of years old, but the specialists who obtained these results have definitely not accepted this conclusion. To keep from concluding that the rocks are only thousands of years old, they claim that the radiocarbon must be due to contamination, either from the field or from the laboratory or from both.
Figure 2 Radiocarbon shouldnt be found in old rocks, but it is!
Once creatures die, the radiocarbon in their bodies should quickly break down.
These findings are reported in the secular scientific literature (but they are usually rejected as measurement errors).